Detailing Prevention Recommendations From the RNAO Best Practice Guideline - Pressure Injury Management: Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment, Fourth Edition

Authors

  • Brenda Stade International Affairs and Best Practice Guidelines Centre, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Amy Burt International Affairs and Best Practice Guidelines Centre, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Nafsin Nizum International Affairs and Best Practice Guidelines Centre, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Lyndsay Howitt International Affairs and Best Practice Guidelines Centre, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Giulia Zucal International Affairs and Best Practice Guidelines Centre, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Corey Heerschap Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada
  • Dimitri Beeckman Örebro University, Swedish Centre for Skin and Wound Research, Örebro, Sweden; Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63354/cjwoc.v1i3.16185

Keywords:

Pressure injury, prevention, repositioning, care bundle, prophylactic dressings

Abstract

Background
Pressure injuries (PIs) constitute some of the costliest adverse events in hospitals, in long-term care facilities, and in homecare settings. PIs are painful and can impact quality of life. Depending on the stage of the injury and whether there are complications or comorbidities, healing may take weeks, months, or years and can contribute to premature mortality. The Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) released a best practice guideline (BPG) in November 2024 with evidence-based recommendations on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of PIs. This paper focuses on the prevention of PIs that are outlined in this guideline. 

Methods
Best practice guidelines are based on systematic reviews and developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A panel of PI experts was convened to guide the process. We conducted a systematic literature review focusing on three preventive areas as related to PIs: repositioning frequency, care bundles, and use of prophylactic dressings. We searched seven databases for relevant English-language studies published since January 2018. Two reviewers independently assessed the research for eligibility and for risk of bias and determined the validity of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

Results
We screened 1,295 articles for 3 priority research questions. Of these articles, 234 full-text publications were reviewed for relevance, and 14 were used to inform 3 recommendations on repositioning frequency, preventive care bundles, and the use of prophylactic dressings.

Conclusion
This paper provides nurses and other members of the interprofessional team, including persons and their families, with evidence-based recommendations for preventing PIs.

 

 

 

References

1. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. The International Guideline. Emily Haesler, ed. EPUAP/NPIA/PPPIA; 2019.

2. Chung ML, Widdel M, Kirchhoff J, et al. Risk factors for pressure injuries in adult patients: a narrative synthesis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):761.

3. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO). Pressure Injury Management: Risk Assessment, Prevention and Treatment. 4th Ed. RNAO; 2024.

4. National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel. NPIAP pressure injury stages, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel. Accessed December 18, 2025. cdn.ymaws.com/npiap.com/resource/resmgr/online_store/npiap_pressure_injury_stages.pdf

5. Woodbury MG, Houghton PE. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Canadian healthcare settings. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(10):22-24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36-38.

6. Health Quality Ontario (HQO). Pressure injuries: care for patients in all settings. Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2017. Accessed December 4, 2025. https://www.hqontario.ca/Portals/0/documents/evidence/quality-standards/qs-pressure-injuries-clinical-guide-en.pdf

7. Siotos C, Bonett AM, Damoulakis G, et al. Burden of pressure injuries: findings from the global burden of disease study. Eplasty. 2022;22:e19.

8. Padula WV, Pronovost PJ, Makic MBF, et al. Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(2):132-141. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007505

9. Chan B, Ieraci L, Mitsakakis N, Pham B, Krahn M. Net costs of hospital-acquired and pre-admission PUs among older people hospitalised in Ontario. J Wound Care. 2013;22(7):341-2, 344-346. doi:10.12968/jowc.2013.22.7.341

10. Padula WV, Delarmente BA. The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States. Int Wound J. 2019;16(3):634-640. doi:10.1111/iwj.13071

11. Health Quality Ontario (HQO), Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI). Never events for hospital care in Canada: safer care for patients. CPSI, 2015. Accessed December 4, 2025. www.healthcareexcellence.ca/media/eceoshdc/never-events-for-hospital-care-in-canada.pdf

12. Healthcare Excellence Canada (HEC). Pressure ulcer: introduction. Accessed December 4, 2025. www.healthcareexcellence.ca/en/resources/hospital-harm-is-everyones-concern/hospital-harm-improvement-resource/pressure-ulcer-introduction/

13. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Worsened pressure ulcer in long-term care. Updated July 2025. Accessed December 4, 2025.

https://www.cihi.ca/en/indicators/worsened-pressure-ulcer-in-long-term-care

14. Howitt L, Burt A, Nizum N, Buchanan C, Rey M, Grinspun D. Best practice guideline development methods: An integrated approach based on the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario's methods. Clin Pub Health Guidelines. 2026;3(1):e70052. doi:10.1002/gin2.70052

15. Schunemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman, A, eds. Handbook for Grading the Quality of Evidence and the Strength of Recommendations Using the GRADE Approach, 2013. Accessed December 4, 2025. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html

16. Neumann I, Santesso N, Akl EA, et al. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;72:45-55. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.017

17. Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JPT, et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-234. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005

18. Sterne AC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:I4898. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898

19. Sterne AC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355: i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919

20. Gillespie BM, Walker RM, Latimer SL, et al. Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD009958 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009958.pub3

21. Yap TL, Horn SD, Sharkey PD, et al. Effect of varying repositioning frequency on pressure injury prevention in nursing home residents: TEAM-UP trial results. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022 Jun 1;35(6):315-325. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000817840.68588.04

22. Darvall JN, Mesfin L, Gorelik A. Increasing frequency of critically ill patient turns is associated with a reduction in pressure injuries. Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Sept;20(3):217-222.

23. Horner DL, Bellamy MC. Care bundles in intensive care. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2012 Aug;12(4):199-202.

24. Lin F, Zijing W, Song B, Coyer, F, Chaboyer W. The effectiveness of multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;102:103483. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103483

25. Pena H, Millard A, Richardson A. Implementation and evaluation of a pressure injury prevention bundle in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit. J Nurs Care Qual. 2024;39(1):1-3. doi:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000727

26. Yilmazer T, Tuzer H. Effectiveness of a pressure injury prevention care bundle; prospective interventional study in intensive care units. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(3):226-232. doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000875

27. Zhang X, Wu Z, Zhao B, Zhang Q, Li Z. Implementing a pressure injury care bundle in Chinese intensive care units. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:2435-2442. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S292579

28. Singh C, Shoqirat N, Thorpe L, Villaneuva S. Sustainable pressure injury prevention. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12(2):e002248. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002248

29. Aprea V, Barón FJ, Meregalli C, Sabatini, M. Impact of a health care quality improvement intervention to prevent pressure ulcers in a pediatric intensive care unit. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018 Aug;116(4):e529-e541. doi:10.5546/aap.2018.eng.e529

30. Oozageer Gunowa N, Hutchinson M, Brooke J, Jackson, D. Pressure injuries in people with darker skin tones: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(17-18):3266-3275. doi:10.1111/jocn.14062

31. Kalowes P, Messina V, Li M. Five-layered soft silicone foam dressing to prevent pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2016;25(6):e108-19. doi:10.4037/ajcc2016875

32. Moore ZE, Webster J. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 6;12(12):CD009362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009362.pub3

33. Liao N, Wang F, He X, Li L, Fei J. Predictive application of foam dressing on preventing of auricle pressure injury caused by ear dressing. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e14883. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14883

34. Hahnel E, El Genedy M, Tomova-Simitchieva T, et al. The effectiveness of two silicone dressings for sacral and heel pressure ulcer prevention compared with no dressings in high-risk intensive care unit patients: a randomized controlled parallel-group trial. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):256-264. doi:10.1111/bjd.18621

35. Beeckman D, Fourie A, Raepsaet C, et al. Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a pragmatic noncommercial multicentre randomized open-label parallel-group medical device trial. Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jul;185(1):52-61. doi:10.1111/bjd.19689

36. Heerschap C, Nicholas A, Whitehead M. Wound management: investigating the interprofessional decision-making process. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1), 233-242. doi:10.1111/iwj.13017

37. Heerschap C, Woo KY. Formal caregiver experiences of caring for individuals at risk for or with a pressure injury: a metasynthesis. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022;35(12): 680-687. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000855044.92545.af

38. Gilhooly D, Green SA, McCann C, Black N, Moonesinghe SR. Barriers and facilitators to the successful development, implementation and evaluation of care bundles in acute care in hospital: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):47. doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0894-2

39. Kandula U. Impact of multifaceted interventions on pressure injury prevention: a systematic review. BMC Nurs. 2025;24(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12912-024-02558-9

Published

2026-01-26

How to Cite

Stade, B., Burt, A., Nizum, N., Howitt, L., Zucal, G., Heerschap, C., & Beeckman, D. (2026). Detailing Prevention Recommendations From the RNAO Best Practice Guideline - Pressure Injury Management: Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment, Fourth Edition. Canadian Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence, 1(3), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.63354/cjwoc.v1i3.16185